Test Number71
TitleThinking Creatively with Sounds and Words
AuthorTorrance, E. P; Khatena, J. ; Cunnington, B. F.
CategoryTest
Copyright Date1973
AvailabilityFrom publisher
Restrictions 
Age/Grade LevelGrade 3-adult
Cost$37.65 plus $23.40 for audio cassette, for either form (must specify form and level)
FormsIA and IB for students Gr 3-12, Forms IIA and IIB for adults (ie., ages 20+).
SourceScholastic Testing Service, Inc.
Address480 Meyer Rd. Bensenville, IL 60106-1617
Phone800-642-6STS
Fax630-766-8054
web or e-mailwww.ststesting.com
DefinitionBased on the author’s analysis of the importance of metaphor and imagery in creativity.
PurposesThe tests were designed as training activities for creative thinking and tests of originality. Includes two instruments: Sounds and Images, and Onomatopoeia and Images
CharacteristicsGenerating Ideas Openness and Courage to Explore Ideas

Manual
GoodThe manual is well-organized and clearly-written. Includes discussions of the measure’s target populations and uses, norms, validity and reliability evidence, and instructions for administration and scoring.

Validity
FairReports data for each test, but overall validity evidence is quite limited.

Reliability
FairInter-rater for Form A .88 to .97, Form B .95 to .97. Needs additional data regarding stability.

Utility
GoodThis test may be administered to individuals or groups by any professional who has read the material. The directions are clear, the test untimed. It requires 30 to 35 minutes to administer, 20 minutes with experience. It is composed of two tests. Scoring is done locally by hand.

Interpretation
PoorThere is very little information to guide the user in interpretation or application of the results. The user must be familiar, therefore, with other literature on creativity and imagery to interpret the results appropriately. The instrument is probably better suited for instructional use than for identification.

Propriety
PoorNot addressed

Reviews & Related Lit
MMY #9, 1985: Fox, L. H. “In conclusion, given the possible lack of stability over time as found in one study, and the need for more validity research, I strongly concur with the authors’ decision to maintain the research status of the test. Use for identification of students for special programs is clearly not warranted.”


CCL Home Page    Copyright © 2002 Center For Creative Learning, Inc.    Back to Index    Next Test